Isn.t Lectora Std HTML nonSCORM?
November 8, 2008 12:00 AM
Interesting. Well, when they were first testing a course, I published to SCORM 1.2 and they said "don't do that, use 2004". Along the way I recall a problem where every course they tested ended up with the awful navigation panel on the left, which sounds oddly like what is described when using the LRN formatt. Yikes. Eventually they altered the LMS so that it didn't do that. Now we have been instructed to change the course title properties to a Simple Lectora format (which generates a warning that you are loosing the AU) and then publish to SCORM 2004. According to them, it works fine. Seems weird to me.
Discussions have been disabled for this post